Schopenhauer: On the Suffering of the World




Life is a loan received from death, it’s a dream and death an awakening.

Arthur Schopenhauer, a German philosopher from the late 18th century, is known in academic circles as a pessimist.

He calls life a suffering, and man, being the intelligent creature he is, essentially bored. This boredom he fills with numerous wants and desires; expensive clothes, holidays and also love. In working towards a goal, he kills boredom, but once he reaches it, he is bored again and preoccupies himself with the next project.

“Imagine this race transported to Utopia where everything grows of its own accord and turkeys fly around ready-roasted, where lovers find one another without any delay and keep one another without any difficulty: in such a place some men would die of boredom or hang themselves, some would fight and kill one another, and thus they would create for themselves more suffering then nature inflicts on them as it is.”

He goes on to say most people are oblivious to the suffering of life and live in the moment enjoying the small things. But time is so fickle, that each moment that goes by is the past and no one knows what the next moment holds, so is it even worth enjoying this moment?

He gives the example of a man going for surgery who has been given a strong dose of anesthesia. He does not feel physical pain because his brain does not register it, even though his body is being torn apart. A spiritually weak man is a similar creature. The more knowledge one gains, the more one is aware of the suffering every day.

I particularly enjoyed his take on the cycle of life, where based on established social norms, a man and woman marry and raise a family.

“If the act of procreation were neither the outcome of a desire nor accompanied by feelings of pleasure, but a matter to be decided on the basis of purely rational considerations, is it likely the human race would still exist? Would each of us not rather have felt so much pity for the coming generation as to prefer to spare it the burden of existence, or at least not wish to take it upon himself to impose that burden upon it in cold blood.”

He says he believes in ascetism which he describes as “the denial of the will to live”. Although, he calls this the true Christian philosophy, the concept is also part of Islam, in the form of Zuhd or detachment. Where one lives like a traveler, and does not hold on to too many worldly things.

Perhaps, this exchange sums it up best.

Man: But what do I get from existence? If it is full I have only distress, if empty only boredom. How can you offer me so poor a reward for so much labour and so much suffering?


Spirit: Should I tell him that the value of life lies precisely in this, that it teaches him not to want it?

Modernism- as Tagore puts it



“Modernising is a mere affecatation of modernism, just as an affectation of poesy is poetising. It is nothing but mimicry, only affectation is louder than the original, and it is too literal.

One must bear in mind that those who have the true modern spirit need not modernise, just as those who are truly brave are not braggarts.

Modernism is not in the dress of the Europeans, or in the hideous structures where their children are interned when they take their lessons, or in the square houses with flat straight wall-surfaces, pierced with parallel lines of windows, where these people are caged in their lifetime; certainly modernism is not in their ladies’ bonnets, carrying on them loads of incongruities. These are not modern but merely European.
True modernism is freedom of mind, not slavery of taste. It is independence of thought and action, not tutelage under European schoolmasters. It is science but not its wrong application in life-a mere imitation of our science teachers who reduce it into superstition, absurdly imposing its aid for all impossible purposes.

Life based upon mere science is attractive to some men, because it has all the charecterisitics of sport; it feigns seriousness, but is not profound.

When you go a-hunting, the less pity you have the better; for your one object is to chase the game and kill it, to feel that you are the greater animal, that your method of destruction is thorough and scientific.

And the life of science is that supeficial life. It pursues success with skill and thoroughness, and takes no account of the higher nature of man. But those whose minds are crude enough to plan their lives upon the supposition that man is merely a hunter and his paradise the paradise of sportsmen will be rudely awakened in the midst of their trophies of skeleton and skulls.”

Rabindranath Tagore- from his lectures in Japan 19196-1917.